Tag Archives: iran


FORMER US MILITARY PERSONNEL EXPOSE TRUTH OF BENGHAZI: IRAN’S QUDS FORCE AND SULEIMANI LED ATTACKS AGAINST AMERICANS, US MILITARY ORDERED TO STAND DOWN

BENGHAZI ATTACK

Update:  On June 17, 2019, two days after this article was published, former Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi collapsed and died in an Egyptian courtroom minutes after telling the judge he had “many secrets” he could reveal during his espionage trial.

By Mary Fanning and Alan Jones | June 15, 2019 

New information regarding the September 11, 2012 attacks on the U.S. diplomatic outpost and CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya and on the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt has been brought forward by former U.S. military personnel who were on duty that fateful night.

Several of these former U.S. service members who witnessed the unfolding events that night reveal that the attackers in Benghazi were led by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force, under the command of Iranian General Qassem Suleimani.

“Qassem Suleimani, a fanatical Islamic revolutionary, has rapidly become one of the world’s top terrorist suspects, as well as a powerful and sinister force within Iran” according to The Telegraph.

U.S. officials knew that the Quds Force was coordinating and leading the attacks in Benghazi, according to several well-placed sources.

U.S. military forces were ordered not to track or to pursue the Benghazi attackers, former U.S. military personnel confirmed.

According to Kenneth R. Timmerman, the Benghazi attack was funded with hard cash in the form of Euros smuggled into Libya from Malaysia for the Iranian Quds Force.

ADVANCED WARNINGS IGNORED

The human intelligence (HUMINT) warnings began on June 2, 2012, steadily became more serious, and started coming in via much higher-level sources, former U.S. military officials told The American Report.

By September 1, 2012, the warnings were severe enough to warrant removing all key personnel from the areas affected, the most threatened area being Benghazi. All classified or sensitive information, equipment, and personnel of key positions, under policy, were supposed to be moved to a more secure location.

On the night of the attacks, at least 35 Americans were still stationed at the State Department and CIA facilities in Benghazi.

Signals intelligence began corroborating the human intelligence already coming in, verifying the threat levels.

Inexplicably, security was lessened in the areas that were targeted, even after multiple requests to increase security. On or about May 9, 2012, even more security personnel were removed for unknown reasons.

SEPTEMBER 11, 2012

On September 11, 2012, when the attacks began in Benghazi, CENTCOM was conducting a training exercise known as Internal Look 12 (IL 12), according to a former U.S. military official.

CENTCOM did not stop the training event until eight hours after the attacks began. During the attacks, no one was allowed to stop training in order to engage the attacking terrorists.

At AFRICOM, they contacted every intelligence agency. They called the watch desk. They notified the U.S. Navy 6th Fleet. They reached out to Joint Operations Command (JOC).  The commanding officer at AFRICOM told them they could do nothing.

U.S. military aircraft, ships, pararescue teams, and special operators were ordered not to respond, according to former U.S. troops who were on duty during the attacks in Benghazi.

A Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) pararescue team was on 24-7 standby at AFRICOM’s Camp Lemonnier in Djibouti, a small African nation north of Somalia.

Former U.S. military personnel who were on duty the night of the Benghazi attacks unequivocally state that the airspace over North Africa was wide open, with no air traffic that would impede rescue flights.

At Spangdahlem Air Base in Germany, it was “Wheels Up.” Rescue teams were ready to go. Others were notified and on alert at Aviano Air Base and Naval Air Station Sigonella in Italy, should they need refueling.

Yet, all were told to stand down.

Fox News reported on May 12, 2016, that a squadron member from Aviano Air Base who “asked that his identity be protected for fear of retribution . . . said that a team was ready to go that night to help protect Americans under fire in Benghazi:” 

His squadron got the alert: a “real world mission was going down.”

The team – at Aviano Air Base in northeastern Italy – raced to the field and was briefed, as planes were armed and prepared to launch. Hundreds of miles away, fellow Americans were under attack in Benghazi.

“There were people everywhere,” said the witness, who was on the ground that night but wished to remain anonymous. “That flight line was full of people, and we were all ready to go” to Benghazi.

Only they were waiting for the order. It never came.

“The whole night we were told that we are waiting on a call,” he told Fox News. . .

. . . The source said: “I definitely believe that our aircraft could have taken off and gotten there in a timely manner, maybe three hours at the most, in order to at least stop that second mortar attack … and basically save lives that day.”

Former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were killed in that second wave. Ambassador Chris Stevens and information officer Sean Smith were killed in the initial attack on the main compound.

“We could have been there. That’s the worst part,” the source said.

The source who spoke with Fox News challenged the military claim that a re-fueling tanker wasn’t available. He said American jets routinely refuel by using what’s called a “hot pit maneuver,” which allows the jets to land and then get fuel without shutting off the engines. . .

. . . The same frustrations have compelled Mike, a former team sergeant for a military anti-terror quick reaction force, once known as the CIF, to talk.

“For some reason they were all shut down, and I think it leads back to a policymaker somewhere because nobody in the military is going to shut down an operation,” he said. On the night of the attack, Mike was at Delta Force headquarters in the U.S. monitoring the events as they happened.

“We had hours and hours and hours to do something … and we did nothing,” he said. . .

. . . Mike echoed that: “I know everything was spun up and nothing was done.”

He added: “At our level, we were doing everything we were supposed to be doing. At everybody else’s level above us, it was political.”

Fox News also broadcast a video segment featuring the anonymous witness.

During the attacks on Benghazi, there were U.S. ships off the coast of Libya, fast movers in the air, and forces on the ground that were told to stand down.

There was also Special Ops in the air that were turned around. U.S. troops were advised the State Department (DOS) had it under control, former military personnel say.

British and French forces in the region, including a French warship, offered assistance in responding to the attack in Benghazi.

All offers of assistance from allied forces were rejected, the former U.S. military members relay.

One former U.S. military official noted that the Defense Department’s GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SUPPORT (GCCS) system would have retained records of all available military assets in the region that could have launched rescue operations.

Of interest is the terrorist who was filmed running into the Benghazi mission yelling to his fellow terrorists “Don’t shoot, Don’t shoot. Dr. Morsi sent us.” The U.S. Embassy in Cairo was also under attack on September 11, 2012.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi, leader of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood party, in Cairo in July 2012, two months before the 9/11 attacks against U.S. diplomatic staff in Cairo, Egypt and Benghazi, Libya.

Marking a stark change in diplomatic tone, one month after Hillary Clinton’s meetings with Egyptian President Morsi, Morsi met with Iranian Vice President Hamid Baqai. The unusual Egyptian-Iranian meeting took place in August 2012, just weeks before the 9/11 attacks against U.S. diplomatic staff in Cairo and Benghazi.

U.S. EMBASSY IN CAIRO, EGYPT UNDER ASSAULT ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2012, SAME DAY AS BENGHAZI ATTACK

The same night that U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in Benghazi, the U.S. embassy in Cairo was also under assault by 2,500 enraged local nationals led by the Muslim Brotherhood.

Two former U.S. armed services personnel revealed that U.S. Marines guarding the U.S. Embassy in Cairo were ordered to lock up their weapons in the arms room while the angry mob outside the embassy was protesting and burning the American flag.

At least six protesters from the mob got over the wall and inside the embassy compound. The U.S. embassy in Cairo is sovereign U.S. territory.

At the same time that the Marine Security Guards protecting the U.S. Embassy in Cairo were ordered to lock up their weapons in the arms room, further instructions came that directed the U.S. Marines to surrender the embassy to Mohamed Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood government.

Anne Patterson, U.S. Ambassador to Egypt, was safe and sound in Washington D.C. during the Cairo embassy siege.

Coincidentally, U.S. Army General Carter Ham, commander of AFRICOM, was also in Washington that fateful evening.

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF GENERAL DEMPSEY AND DEFENSE SECRETARY LEON PANETTA LIED

General Ham testified on June 26, 2013, before the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation, that moments after the Benghazi attacks began, he alerted Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey.

Secretary Panetta testified during a February 7, 2013, Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the Defense Department’s response to the Benghazi attack:

There was no specific intelligence or indication of imminent attack on the U.S. facilities in Benghazi. And, frankly, without an adequate warning, there was not enough time given the speed of the attacks for armed military assets to respond.

The United States military, as I’ve said, is not and, frankly, should not be a 911 service capable of arriving on the scene within minutes to every possible contingency around the world.

General Dempsey stated during the same hearing:

There’s some places on the planet where we have some gaps and I think North Africa’s probably one of them.

The statements of these former U.S. troops who were on duty the evening of the Benghazi attacks stand in stark contrast to the statements of Secretary Panetta and General Dempsey.  Resources and military assets were readily available.

Multiple attacks on Western embassies had already taken place. Dempsey and Panetta had every reason to be on high alert as they had been forewarned by recent events.

The September 11 attacks in Benghazi and at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo were the continuation of an already-established pattern:

  • SEPTEMBER 9, 2011 — ATTACK ON ISRAELI EMBASSY IN CAIRO (ISRAELI AMBASSADOR HAD TO HIDE IN SAFE HAVEN THEN FLEE)
  • NOVEMBER 29, 2011 — ATTACK ON BRITISH EMBASSY IN TEHRAN (BRITAIN HAD TO ABANDON THE EMBASSY FOR FOUR YEARS)
  • NOVEMBER 29, 2011 — ATTACK ON SECOND BRITISH DIPLOMATIC COMPOUND IN TEHRAN

These subsequent attacks should not have been unexpected or come as a surprise:

  • SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 — ATTACK ON US EMBASSY IN CAIRO AND ON DIPLOMATIC COMPOUND AND CIA ANNEX IN BENGHAZI
  • SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 — ATTACK ON US EMBASSY IN SANAA, YEMEN

The Guardian reported on August 23, 2015:

The mob that forced its way into the main embassy enclosure and a second British compound in north Tehran included many members of the Basij militia which is linked to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Some of the protesters held aloft pictures of Qassem Suleimani, the head of the IRGC external wing, the Quds force.

The long shadow of the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran was cast in 2012 as Americans were being butchered by the Iranian Quds Force in Benghazi and as an inflamed mob, led by the Muslim Brotherhood, surrounded the U.S. Embassy in Cairo.

U.S. military personnel were told that they could not rescue their fellow Americans.

Permanently etched in the minds and souls of the U.S. military personnel who were on duty the night of the Benghazi attacks is the betrayal of their fellow Americans by the Obama administration.

Desperate calls for help went unanswered. For those former American troops who were ordered not to launch a rescue mission, waiting for accountability has felt like an eternity.


DOOMSDAY SOCCER BALLS: IRANIAN AND NORTH KOREAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS MIRROR DR. JAFAR’S IRAQI “BEACH BALL”; IRAN TELEGRAPHS INTENT

By Mary Fanning and Alan Jones | July 8, 2018

At an April 30 news conference at Israel’s Ministry of Defense headquarters in Tel Aviv, Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu unveiled Iran’s spherical, miniaturized nuclear weapon design, an implosion device strikingly similar to “Beach Ball,” the weapon of mass destruction (WMD) masterpiece of rogue Iraqi nuclear physicist Dr. Jafar Dhia Jafar.

Spherical nuclear implosion devices such as Dr. Jafar’s “Beach Ball” are powerful nuclear bombs compact enough to be mounted on missiles. More


The American Report Radio LIVE – Saturday, 8/29, 8am EST

tar_200

DON’T MISS THE AMERICAN REPORT WEEKLY RADIO PROGRAM!
8AM EST SATURDAY MORNING!

Our panel of expert insiders will discuss the week’s hottest topics, including:

  • The DC-Media Axis
  • A Conservative Revolution on the Right? Update on Donald Trump and Ted Cruz
  • Global Refugee Crisis and Refugee Resettlement & Refugee Resettlement in America
  • Newly formalized Israeli-Saudi Alliance

& more…

You can listen to The American Report live on JJ McCartney’s Nightside Radio Studios.

You can also listen Red State Talk Radio, Studio A!

Listen to recorded show HERE!

Call-in #: (855) 853-5227


Military experts: Iran already has nuclear weapons

Originally at WND

By Jerome Corsi

NEW YORK – Amid debate over President Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran, two retired military officers contend their accumulation of evidence from open and intelligence sources shows Tehran already has a nuclear-weapons capability.

Retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely and U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Dennis B. Haney assert that since 1979, a cabal of nations has aided and abetted Iran in its efforts to develop a robust nuclear program under the guise of generating a nuclear-energy system.

And they believe the White House is fully aware.

In an interview, Vallely told WND that President Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry and chief White House adviser Valerie Jarrett “are treading on treason under the U.S. Constitution for aiding and abetting Iran, a known enemy of the United States, while throwing Israel, a longtime U.S. ally, to the wolves.”

They charge the cabal is mainly comprised of Russia, China and North Korea, which have worked behind the scenes in collaboration with Iran to put all the parts in place.

Jerome Corsi’s and Michael Evans’ “Showdown with Nuclear Iran” uncovers the apocalyptic beliefs of Iran’s Islamic leaders that help fuel the drive to acquire nuclear weapons

The assistance includes providing the material needed to make a bomb. Vallely and Haney believe Iran can make a bomb now, and a “breakout” nuclear test detonation is imminent.

‘Treading on treason’

Vallely told WND that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “knows that Israel has little option but to launch a pre-emptive military strike on Iran, and I suspect Saudi Arabia will assist Israel militarily when the attack occurs.”

“Signing a nuclear agreement legitimizes Iran’s nuclear weapons future, while removing sanctions that gives Iran access to billions of dollars that can be diverted to advancing Iran’s terrorist goals against the United States and Israel,” Vallely said.

Haney agreed.

“President Obama has given the green light to the potential destruction of Israel by signing this agreement while Iran swears ‘death to Israel,’” Haney told WND.

“President Obama knows Iran has the bomb, and he knows Iran plans a nuclear attack on Israel. Obama has never liked Israel; he does not see Israel in the future of the Middle East that he sees dominated by radical Islam.”

Haney said Obama “is simply covering his tracks with this nuclear agreement with Iran.”

“The point is that Obama already knows Iran has the bomb and the entire negotiation has been nothing more than a charade, a smoke screen to cover up that Iran already has the bomb,” he said.

“The White House and Secretary of State Kerry know that Iran already has nuclear weapons capability and, to protect Obama’s legacy, the White House does not want it known Iran was allowed to develop nuclear weapons on Obama’s watch,” he explained.

“This way, a pathway for Iran to get the bomb has been created and put in place, so when Iran finally announces it has a nuclear weapon, Obama can argue that Iran simply got the bomb quicker than anybody anticipated, but not in violation of the agreement.”

He declared: “Iran is a nuclear weapons power now!”

In a joint statement, Vallely and Haney say an accumulation of available evidence shows a coalition of Russia, China and North Korea have assisted Iran since 1979 in achieving a nuclear weapon, despite sanctions, under the guise of a domestic nuclear energy program.

Vallely explained to WND that he and Haney have taken a systematic approach to evaluating each component needed to deliver a nuclear weapon, from the development and testing of a ballistic missile system, to the design of a nuclear weapons warhead, to the development of the weapons-grade uranium needed to produce a bomb.

“To come to our conclusion that Iran is a nuclear weapons power right now, we supplemented publicly available research, plus information from intelligence sources, including Iranian resistance groups such as the National Council of Resistance of IRAN, NCRI,” Vallely explained. “With the assistance of Russia, China and North Korea, Iran has developed and tested every component needed to develop and deliver a nuclear weapon against Israel.”

WND reported in February that the NCRI, in a Washington, D.C., press conference, added to a series of disclosures it made regarding Iran’s secret nuclear weapons program more than a decade ago. NCRI has claimed Tehran is operating a secret uranium-enrichment site northeast of the capital city that was not disclosed during the recent negotiations to the United States or to the United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA.

Vallely and Haney made clear in their statement their conclusion that Iran will soon detonate its first nuclear device.

“Iranian government observers, research scientists and senior military officials have been on-site in North Korea for all their tests of nuclear component systems,” they said. “In essence, Iran has had the benefit of North Korea doing their development and testing for them.”

They said Russia, China and North Korea “always had the latitude and time to develop and test warhead design, fissionable material and detonation testing.”

“Iran participated in most all of the scheduled testing onsite.”

Vallely and Haney said the “release of up to $150 billion in Iranian assets, as a part of the sanctions against Iran, guarantees Iran further funding their nuclear weapons program and their terrorist proxies, Hezbollah and Hamas and others to include Assad of Syria.”

‘Ties to Iran’

Vallely and Haney combine their analysis of Iran’s nuclear weapons capabilities with an argument that Obama, Kerry and Jarrett have close ties to Iran that influence their political judgment.

All three allowed the United States to sign a nuclear weapons agreement with Iran knowing Tehran could develop a nuclear weapon today and realizing that an atomic Iran would be an existential threat to Israel, the retired officers said.

“Barack Hussein Obama, raised and schooled in Islam, mentored by American Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis, with his primary adviser being Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett, has crafted a plan that guarantees Iran will have a nuclear weapon,” they said.

“The copy of the agreement handed out in English for the American delegation did not replicate the copy handed out in Farsi for the Iranians. The American delegation did not bring this up,” Vallely and Haney said.

“The Iranian delegation read both the English and Farsi-worded agreements, and declared that while they agreed with the one in Farsi, the one in English was not the same and was in no way acceptable to them.

“Prime negotiator John Forbes Kerry, himself a communist sympathizer during the Vietnam War, came out this past May with the admission that he has a daughter who married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran,” they noted.

In 2009, Kerry’s daughter, Vanessa Bradford Kerry, married a Los Angeles-based Iranian-American physician, Dr. Brian (Behrooz) ValaNahad, who was born in New York, educated at UCLA, attended medical school at Yale and completed his internship and neurosurgery residence at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

The Nemazee connection

WND has reported the ties between American–Iranian Hassan Nemazee and John Kerry and Hillary Clinton.

Nemazee, prominent in Democratic Party fundraising since Bill Clinton’s second term in the White House, is an American-Iranian now serving time in federal prison for criminal bank fraud. Nemazee’s family fortune in Iran traces back to the Iranian opium shipping trade with China that began in the mid-1800s.

Nemazee’s credentials in raising money for Democratic Party presidential hopefuls is impressive. In 2004, he served as Kerry’s presidential campaign fundraising chairman in New York, and in 2008, he served prominently as one of Hillary Clinton’s most successful national presidential campaign fundraising chairmen.

Coincidentally, Jarrett was born in Shiraz, Fars Province, Iran, in Nemazee Hospital, named after Hassan Nemazee’s father, who had the distinction of transitioning the Nemazee family opium trade with the Far East into the 20th century.

‘Let’s provide Iran nuclear fuel’

WND reported that during his first presidential debate with President George W. Bush in 2004, Kerry, then the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, argued that the U.S. should provide nuclear fuel to Iran. Kerry said the U.S. should trust Tehran, as had President Clinton with North Korea, that the Iranians would not use the fuel to make a bomb.

In the early 1970s, Pyongyang had begun to acquire nuclear fuel and plutonium processing technology from the Soviet Union to expand North Korea’s IRT-2000 research reactor that was gradually diverted to nuclear weapons development.

Then, in October 1994, former President Jimmy Carter announced from Pyongyang that Kim Il-sung had accepted the broad deal later formalized as the “Agreed Framework.” Within less than a decade, North Korea withdrew from the Nonproliferation Treaty and prohibited IAEA inspectors to actively monitor Pyongyang for nuclear weapons activities.

Vallely and Haney, both members of the independent Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi, made clear they are speaking for themselves regarding Iran and not on behalf of the commission.


The American Report Radio LIVE – Saturday, 8/22, 8am EST

 

tar_200

DON’T MISS THE AMERICAN REPORT WEEKLY RADIO PROGRAM!
8AM EST SATURDAY MORNING!

Our panel of expert insiders will discuss the week’s hottest topics, including:

  • Stock Market Crash & Economic Turmoil
  • Trump’s Rally in Mobile & GOP’s effort to destroy him
  • The Growing Domestic Terror Threat
  • Middle East Update
  • Hillary’s email saga

& more…

You can listen to The American Report live on JJ McCartney’s Nightside Radio Studios.

You can also listen Red State Talk Radio, Studio A!

Call-in #: (855) 853-5227


Interview With Ambassador Wallace on the Iran Deal

Original at Founders Code.

Sadly, not only is Iran cheating, it is proven by the side deal they will cheat with White House and United Nations approval. The text of the side deal signed by Iran and the IAEA is here.

Further, Barack Obama has signed waivers on sanctions which allows the existing sanctions to be overlooked and violated by foreign countries where the United States will not apply any punishment.

It is proven that Barack Obama, John Kerry and the other members of the P5+1 don’t have any red-lines with regard to Iran’s actions or violations. Contact your senators and demand they vote no.

Meanwhile, United Against Nuclear Iran is a private group leading the charge to stop the Iran deal. It is led by former Senator Joe Lieberman. The radio interview with UANI CEO Ambassador Mark Wallace is here.

LISTEN HERE!!!

 


IRAN is Nuclear Now! WITH WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT AND DELIVERY SYSTEMS

By MG Paul Vallely, U.S. Army (Ret)

And

LTC Dennis B. Haney, USAF (Ret)

August 20, 2015

Since 1979, a cabal of nations has aided and abetted Iran in its efforts to develop a robust nuclear program under the guise of generating a nuclear energy system. This cabal is mainly comprised of Russia, China, and North Korea. Since sanctions began being placed on Iran in 1979, with more added since, Iran still had enough free reign to develop its capabilities despite the sanctions regime because of this cabal. All the moving parts are in place, the material is there, and this means they are already nuclear – “break out” is imminent now.

During this period, North Korea had evaded sanctions, and like Iran, lied, cheated, and broke virtually every agreement it ever signed with the United Nations. Now North Korea is a nuclear weapons power, and we believe Iran has already done the same. Each had created hidden facilities but only North Korea has actually tested weapons fully. Because Iran has to date only detonated trigger devices that does not mean the Mullahs do not have weapons capability now because they certainly have enough material.

Both Iran and North Korea are also fast approaching inter-continental missile capability, and Iranian government observers, research scientists, and senior military officials have been on-site in North Korea for the testing of its systems.  In essence, Iran has had the benefit of having North Korea essentially do their development and testing for them. Iran has tested their launch systems like the Shahab series of launch and delivery vehicles and the attendant guidance and control systems, and they certainly had fine mentors along the way. The cabal has assisted Iran along all the pathways for acquisition of a nuclear weapon; from system requirements, specifications, prototyping, development, and acquisition. Iran has NEVER had to go it alone.

These are facts. Please feel free to challenge our findings and discuss where you think we have gone wrong.

  • The coalition of Russia, China and North Korea have assisted Iran in achieving a nuclear capable weapon.  Since the 1979 sanctions have been in place, Iran has had free reign to develop their nuclear weapons program unabated.  This weapons program was under the guise of a nuclear energy program for domestic energy production.  China and North Korea during this same timeframe developed their nuclear programs, maturing same to include land-based and sea-launch weapons systems, testing their entire launch, delivery and detonation process through actual nuclear detonations.
  • Iranian Government observers, research scientists, and senior Military officials have been on-site in North Korea for all their tests of nuclear component systems.  In essence, Iran has had the benefit of having
    North Korea essentially do their development and testing for them.
  • Iran was able to test their launch systems (i.e., the Shahab series of launch and delivery vehicles and the attendant guidance and control systems).  Russia, China and North Korea always had the latitude and time to develop and test warhead design, fissionable material and detonation testing.  Iran participated onsite in most all of the scheduled testing.
  • The coalition of Russia, China and North Korea have assisted Iran along all the pathways for acquisition of a nuclear weapon, from system requirements, specifications, prototyping, development, and acquisition.
    Iran has NEVER had to go it alone.  The coalition support them 100%. It is now clear that since 2009, the Obama administration has crafted a plan that guarantees Iran will have a nuclear weapon, and the devil is in the details.  For instance; the copy of the agreement handed out in English for the American delegation did not fully replicate the copy handed out in Farsi for the Iranians.  The American delegation never mentioned this to the West and especially not to the American people nor Congress.  The Iranian delegation read both the English and Farsi-worded agreements, and declared that while they agreed with the one in Farsi, the one in English WAS NOT THE SAME, AND WAS IN NO WAY ACCEPTABLE TO THEM.

In addition, there are more devils in the details, and these are in the side agreements between Iran and the IAEA. We now know that one of those arrangements calls for Iran to actually be its own inspecting body. The fox gets to be the hen house security team. With Obama’s statement to Russian President Dimitri Medvedev in 2012, incoming President Vladimir Putin knew he had the green light on a host of issues with the now famous “live mike” incident.

The green light was not just for missile defense, it also applied to all things Iran. We know this because Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani was seen in Moscow despite a worldwide travel ban, just prior to Secretary of State John Kerry testifying before Congress on the agreement reached with Iran.

Being proven communist sympathizers, John Kerry, Obama, and his henchwoman, Iranian born Valerie Jarret, it is demonstrable that their plan has always been to aid that cabal. Prime negotiator John Kerry, who has his very own place in Communist Vietnam’s War Memorial with a photo, recently admitted that his daughter married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran. Incidentally, Kerry’s chief counterpart in the nuclear deal negotiations, Mohammad Javad Zarif’s son was the best man.

We remind all that Barack Obama, mentored during his formative years by Frank Marshall Davis, a confirmed member of the American Communist Party, is also demonstrably not only predisposed to support all things Islam, he has a close relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood as has been proven in the “Betrayal Papers” series.

Now that the agreement has become a settled international agreement, where the United States would be going it alone if Congress somehow negates our involvement in it, the world will release of up to $150 Billion in Iranian assets all but guarantees funding for their nuclear weapons program and their terrorist proxies, Hezbollah, and Hamas and others, to include Assad of Syria.

What better way to wipe Israel off the face of the earth than a well-timed and specifically-delivered nuclear weapon?  And what better time to “negotiate” a pathway to “achieving” a nuclear weapons capability, than when you already have one? It is important to note as well, that Iran has been designing plans for the United States as well, after all, intercontinental ballistic missiles are not intended for neighboring Israel, they are aimed
at the United States and they have plans for an EMP already drafted.

In January 2014, the Arms Control Association even agreed that “as Iran progresses down a path towards a nuclear-weapons capability, the difficulties in finding a compromise that would protect against a nuclear-armed Iran while being acceptable to the leadership in Tehran have grown.” Obama and Kerry are pushing an agreement upon America that surely many members of Congress have not read, and are not adding to the confidence level needed to ensure Iran does not “go nuclear.”

IT WON’T BE LONG BEFORE IRAN DETONATES ITS FIRST NUCLEAR DEVICE.

In 2015, given that the Iranians have not agreed to any inspection of any facility for many years, and WILL NOT NOW AGREE TO INSPECTION OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES ON MILITARY INSTALLATIONS, the odds that Iran already has a nuclear weapon are really quite high. Why is it acceptable to so many that Iran gets to be its own inspector? The likely answer is, they know Iran already has the capability.

From the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) web site: “Iran acquired the Soviet R-17 (R-300; NATO: Scud-B) from Libya. Tehran has continued to utilize a number of foreign suppliers to develop a missile production infrastructure.

To date, Iran claims to have developed five liquid-propellant ballistic missiles, (the Shahab-1, Shahab-2, Shahab-3, Ghadr-1 and Qiam); the Safir space launch vehicle (SLV); and the solid-propellant Sejjil missile.”

With $150 Billion in assets already flowing their way, they will finalize the first series of deliverable weapons. A first-strike launch against Israel? Support of international radical Islam, the global Caliphate, and terrorism will accelerate worldwide. Nothing will stop Iran and its proxies now if the “Iran Deal” goes forward. The so-called “Iran Deal” is moot at this time and not worth the paper it is written on. The cabal wins!

MG Paul Vallely, US Army (Ret) is the Chairman of Stand Up America, the Legacy National Security Advisory Group and a member of the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi

LTC Denny Haney, USAF (Ret) is a standing Member of the ‘ Citizens Commission on Benghazi and Operations Coordinator of Special Operations Speaks (SOS)


Hillary’s (and Obama’s) Real Email Scandals

The continuing uproar over Hillary’s secret email server and her carelessness with classified information misses the bigger point.

Does anyone believe that if the world today was peaceful and stable anyone would care about Hillary Clinton’s secret email server?

The American people are nothing if not forgiving. In the case of the Clintons, Bill and Hillary, they are forgiving to a fault.  Because the 1990s were relatively peaceful and prosperous, the American people chose to forgive the sins of the offensive (and offending) Clintons. This allowed them to repair their reputations, and later enrich themselves through a global money laundering and bribe machine known as the Clinton Foundation.

Hillary at the State Department: A Force for Sharia Law

Unlike the 1990s, Hillary’s tenure at the State Department was characterized by the promotion of chaos, anarchy, and Islamic terrorism.

The heart of the email scandal is not the less-than-ideal security of the server. Had Hillary’s time at State been successful or even uneventful, such technical details of cybersecurity would be buried in the back pages of the Washington Post and left for review by a special task force at State.

The real scandal that scares Clinton, and terrifies Obama, is what those emails say. It’s more than likely that they tell the truth about the invasion of Libya, the Arab Spring, Benghazi, and Obama’s/Hillary’s relationship with the terrorists. The specter of an alliance with the mothership of all Islamic terror, the Muslim Brotherhood, has stalked Obama since his friendship with Rashid Khalidi was revealed prior to the 2008 election.

Map of Arab Spring countries

Map of Arab Spring countries

We know that PSD-11 was Obama’s directive to codify the United States’ alliance with terrorists. This was the order to the U.S. government to work with the Muslim Brotherhood – the same group that birthed Al Qaeda, Hamas, the Taliban, etc.

By appointing Hillary, and her special assistant Huma Abedin, Obama effectively handed over the State Department to the Muslim Brotherhood. They used the U.S. Department of State to overthrow allied governments. Ruling Libya today is a terror regime, providing a base of operations for ISIS. In former regions of Iraq and Syria, a nascent Caliphate spreads like a cancer, committing genocide to erase all that is pre- and non-Islamic.

Through PSD-11, Obama and Hillary executed their plan to turn the existing order in the Middle East on its head by allying the U.S. with terrorists. The plan demanded isolating and endangering American allies, including Israel, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia. In doing so, they made the United States government a pariah to the civilized world.

With the recent Iran deal, Obama doubled down. As a result, the world is more dangerous today than it has been in generations.

Thick as Thieves, and the Power of Pardon

That’s why Hillary’s forfeiture of the server to the FBI last week will probably turn out to be a non-event. Does anybody who follows the Clintons think they would voluntarily self-incriminate? Though there may be backups somewhere, we can be sure that any damning emails related to the Arab Spring or the Clinton Foundation’s dirty deals have now been scrubbed clean by the best in the political cover-up business.

Moreover, if the truth got out regarding Hillary, the buck wouldn’t stop with her. It would go immediately up the flag pole, right into the Oval Office.

Obama’s “Department of Justice” is no such thing. Indeed, it is political weapon that creatively embraces injustice. With such endemic corruption, Hillary’s email scandal will probably culminate in the selection of a “fall person,” who would perhaps be charged (like David Petraeus) for mishandling classified information.  This will clear the air for Hillary in 2016.

If this scenario plays out as predicted, Hillary will serve as a fall person for her former boss Obama, and then select among her staff her own sacrifice so that she can still run in 2016.

Finally, a Presidential pardon could clean up the mess, allowing Hillary’s fall person to avoid any and all consequences.


Counter-terrorism expert addresses Muslim Brotherhood in US Gov’t [video]

Counter-terrorism expert Wallace Bruschweiler talks to a Tea Party about the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. government, the corruption of the Obama administration and complicit GOP, among other contemporary problems.

For more information on the Muslim Brotherhood, see The Betrayal Papers.


When it comes to Islam, Sunni or Shia, Obama Chooses the Terrorists

Summary: Like his support for the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood terrorists across the region, the facts of the Iran deal with Shiite terror regime in Tehran point to a deliberate plan of allying the United States with the worst of Islamic terrorists.

Obama’s nuclear “deal” with Iran has been compared to British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain’s appeasement of Hitler. For those less familiar with the history of the Second World War, Chamberlain’s Munich deal was a betrayal of Czechoslovakia. Students of World War II know, however, that Chamberlain ultimately led the early British war effort against the Nazis. Chamberlain may have been a fool, but he was not intent on destroying the British Empire.

The same benefit of the doubt cannot be given to Barack Hussein Obama. This deal is not appeasement; it is unconditional surrender. Consider below the treasonous terms of the agreement:

  • Up to 78 days may elapse before inspectors can survey Iranian nuclear sites
  • Iran can provide its own soil samples for testing
  • The United States is obligated to help protect Iran’s nuclear program from sabotage
  • $150 billion in frozen Iranian assets will now be unfrozen, by proxy making the United States the largest financial sponsor of terrorism in the world
  • The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) negotiated “side deals” with Iran, which are secret and the details of which are not known to Congress
  • The negotiations began in secret, with Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett, behind the back of U.S. ally Israel. Israel, like the United States, has been the target of Iranian sponsored terrorism since 1979

If Obama is Chamberlain, then the United States is not England, but Czechoslovakia.

They’ll do anything to Harm America

Obama has consistently attacked and utterly betrayed American interests at every possible juncture. Is anyone genuinely surprised by these outrageous, humiliating, and surreally self-destructive terms?

Kerry and Iranian counterpart Zarif

Kerry and Iranian counterpart Zarif

For Secretary of State and Vietnam-era traitor John Kerry, the negotiation was practically a family reunion. Not only is his daughter married to Iranian man with family in Iran, but his son-in-law’s best man at the wedding is the son of his Iranian counterpart, negotiator Mohammad Javad Zarif. Kerry first met Zarif at a dinner party hosted by another Obama puppet master, George Soros.

Like a bratty child playing one parent against the other, Kerry remarked at the Council on Foreign Relations “Do you think the ayatollah is going to come back to the table if Congress refuses this and negotiate this again?”

Translation: “But Mom, Dad already told me I could!” This was a warning to Congress from the Ayatollah himself.

What would look differently in this deal if an agent of Ayatollah Khamenei were in Obama’s place? Given his supremely questionable background and affiliations, including long-standing connections to radical Palestinians and subversive American communists, do you think some of that anti-American hatred might have rubbed off? There’s a 6 ½ year trail of deceit to support this conclusion.

The Plan All Along

The idea of legitimizing the Islamic Republic of Iran goes back to at least 2008. While the Bush administration was attempting its own nuclear negotiations, the Obama campaign used a back channel to the terror state to assure them that his future administration would give them a much better deal. Thus, Obama undermined Bush’s negotiations for the explicit purpose of providing Iran with extremely favorable terms at our expense.

In 2009, when the anti-Ayatollah “Green Revolution” tried to topple the regime, Obama ignored it. At the time, many were left scratching their heads as to why. Now we know.

The Reputation of the U.S.A. Hangs in the Balance

Regardless of what Congress may do, whether they approve or derail the deal, it is up to the American public to show our outrage and disgust. With an approval rating of below 20%, Congress no longer represents the will of the American people. They will likely pass this deal and expect the citizens to accept it.

The deal must not stand. For the sake of America’s dignity and good reputation, the people and the free press must continue to make their cries heard!

And whoever the next president is, this deal must be ripped up and thrown in the trash where it belongs… along with the rest of Obama’s disgraceful embrace of Islamic terrorism.