When it comes to Islam, Sunni or Shia, Obama Chooses the Terrorists

Summary: Like his support for the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood terrorists across the region, the facts of the Iran deal with Shiite terror regime in Tehran point to a deliberate plan of allying the United States with the worst of Islamic terrorists.

Obama’s nuclear “deal” with Iran has been compared to British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain’s appeasement of Hitler. For those less familiar with the history of the Second World War, Chamberlain’s Munich deal was a betrayal of Czechoslovakia. Students of World War II know, however, that Chamberlain ultimately led the early British war effort against the Nazis. Chamberlain may have been a fool, but he was not intent on destroying the British Empire.

The same benefit of the doubt cannot be given to Barack Hussein Obama. This deal is not appeasement; it is unconditional surrender. Consider below the treasonous terms of the agreement:

  • Up to 78 days may elapse before inspectors can survey Iranian nuclear sites
  • Iran can provide its own soil samples for testing
  • The United States is obligated to help protect Iran’s nuclear program from sabotage
  • $150 billion in frozen Iranian assets will now be unfrozen, by proxy making the United States the largest financial sponsor of terrorism in the world
  • The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) negotiated “side deals” with Iran, which are secret and the details of which are not known to Congress
  • The negotiations began in secret, with Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett, behind the back of U.S. ally Israel. Israel, like the United States, has been the target of Iranian sponsored terrorism since 1979

If Obama is Chamberlain, then the United States is not England, but Czechoslovakia.

They’ll do anything to Harm America

Obama has consistently attacked and utterly betrayed American interests at every possible juncture. Is anyone genuinely surprised by these outrageous, humiliating, and surreally self-destructive terms?

Kerry and Iranian counterpart Zarif

Kerry and Iranian counterpart Zarif

For Secretary of State and Vietnam-era traitor John Kerry, the negotiation was practically a family reunion. Not only is his daughter married to Iranian man with family in Iran, but his son-in-law’s best man at the wedding is the son of his Iranian counterpart, negotiator Mohammad Javad Zarif. Kerry first met Zarif at a dinner party hosted by another Obama puppet master, George Soros.

Like a bratty child playing one parent against the other, Kerry remarked at the Council on Foreign Relations “Do you think the ayatollah is going to come back to the table if Congress refuses this and negotiate this again?”

Translation: “But Mom, Dad already told me I could!” This was a warning to Congress from the Ayatollah himself.

What would look differently in this deal if an agent of Ayatollah Khamenei were in Obama’s place? Given his supremely questionable background and affiliations, including long-standing connections to radical Palestinians and subversive American communists, do you think some of that anti-American hatred might have rubbed off? There’s a 6 ½ year trail of deceit to support this conclusion.

The Plan All Along

The idea of legitimizing the Islamic Republic of Iran goes back to at least 2008. While the Bush administration was attempting its own nuclear negotiations, the Obama campaign used a back channel to the terror state to assure them that his future administration would give them a much better deal. Thus, Obama undermined Bush’s negotiations for the explicit purpose of providing Iran with extremely favorable terms at our expense.

In 2009, when the anti-Ayatollah “Green Revolution” tried to topple the regime, Obama ignored it. At the time, many were left scratching their heads as to why. Now we know.

The Reputation of the U.S.A. Hangs in the Balance

Regardless of what Congress may do, whether they approve or derail the deal, it is up to the American public to show our outrage and disgust. With an approval rating of below 20%, Congress no longer represents the will of the American people. They will likely pass this deal and expect the citizens to accept it.

The deal must not stand. For the sake of America’s dignity and good reputation, the people and the free press must continue to make their cries heard!

And whoever the next president is, this deal must be ripped up and thrown in the trash where it belongs… along with the rest of Obama’s disgraceful embrace of Islamic terrorism.

Print Friendly



3 thoughts on “When it comes to Islam, Sunni or Shia, Obama Chooses the Terrorists

Leave a Reply